Cartwright

United States v. Cartwright

Good Law
48 F. App'x 660
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 10, 2002No. 01-50561; D.C. No. CR-96-00290-ER-02California147 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Marfus Tyrone Cartwright appeals the district court’s revocation of his supervised release, arising from his underlying conviction for conspiracy to distribute cocaine, possession with intent to distribute cocaine, and aiding and abetting.

Cartwright’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has moved to withdraw as counsel of record. Cartwright did not file a pro se supplemental brief. Because our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), reveals no arguable issues, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm the revocation of Cartwright’s supervised release.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.