Bogart

MEMORANDUM **

Peter D. Bogart appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing with prejudice his action alleging, among other things, that the California Coastal Commission and various federal and state officials and agencies violated his civil rights. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo both the dismissals for lack of personal jurisdiction, Terracom v. Valley Nat’l Bank, 49 F.3d 555, 559 (9th Cir.1995), and the dismissals on res judicata grounds, W. Radio Servs. Co. v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189 , 1192 (9th Cir.1997). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the action as to the Honorable David A. Workman, a California state judge, and his clerk Joseph F. Fabrizio, for lack of personal jurisdiction, because Bogart did not establish that either had any contacts with the State of Oregon. See Terracom, 49 F.3d at 559-62 .

The district court properly dismissed the action as to the remaining defendants because Bogart had a full and fair opportunity to litigate his claims in prior California state court proceedings and adversary proceedings filed in bankruptcy court. See Monterey Plaza Hotel Ltd. v. Local 188 of the Hotel Employees &…