Worrell-Payne

Worrell-Payne v. Gannett Co.

Good Law
49 F. App'x 105
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 7, 2002No. 01-35112; D.C. No. CV-98-0228-FLVSCalifornia2,204 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Plaintiff-Appellant Judith E. WorrellPayne (‘Worrell-Payne”), the former executive director for the Boise City/Ada County Housing Authority (the “Authority”), brought suit against Defendant-Appellee Gannett Co., Inc. (“Gannett”) for defamation, defamation by implication, intentional infliction of emotional distress, intentional interference with contract, intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, and invasion of privacy, based on a series of articles and editorials which appeared in Gannett’s newspaper, The Idaho Statesman (“The Statesman”), from 1996 to 1998 and were sharply critical of her performance as executive director of the Authority. The district court’s granted summary judgment in favor of Gannett on all of Worrell-Payne’s claims. Worrell-Payne timely appeals. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. See Clicks Billiards Inc. v. Sixshooters, Inc., 251 F.3d 1252, 1257 (9th Cir.2001). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, we must determine whether there are any genuine issues of material fact…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.