Edwards

Edwards v. California Department of Corrections

Good Law
50 F. App'x 366
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 6, 2002No. 01-16696; D. C. No. CV-00-00813-VRWCalifornia95 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

The district court properly denied Appellant California Department of Corrections’ (“CDC”) motion to dismiss. CDC’s *367 challenge to Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act is foreclosed by Hason v. Med. Bd. of Cal, 279 F.3d 1167 , 1171 (9th Cir.2002). CDC’s challenge to § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act is similarly foreclosed. See Lovell v. Chandler, 303 F.3d 1039, 1051 (9th Cir.2002).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.