Resendez-Garcia

United States v. Resendez-Garcia

Good Law
52 F. App'x 60
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 4, 2002No. 02-50273; D.C. No. CR-01-00994-ER-1California205 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Mario Resendez-Garcia appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841, and one count of possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1).

Resendez-Garcia and the government agree that the district court erred by imposing a one-level reduction for minor role *61 in the offense, where the Sentencing Guidelines permit only two-level, three-level, or four-level minor role reductions. U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. The parties also agree that the case should be remanded for re-sentencing. Resendez-Gareia argues that the district court should be instructed on remand to apply the two-level reduction. The government argues that the district court should be instructed to determine whether Resendez-Gareia is entitled to the two-level reduction or no reduction. Following United States v. Jeter, 236 F.3d 1032, 1034-35 (9th Cir.2001), we vacate the sentence and remand for the district court to consider whether Resendez-Gareia deserves a two-level downward adjustment or none at all.

VACATED and REMANDED.

This…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.