Perez-Moreno

United States v. Perez-Moreno

Good Law
52 F. App'x 68
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 5, 2002No. 01-50583; D.C. No. CR-00-02601-HCalifornia283 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Armando Perez-Moreno appeals his jury trial conviction and 51-month sentence for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Perez-Moreno’s first contention is that the district court erred by failing to give two requested jury instructions elaborating on the definition of “alien” and “entry”, based on its determination that the evidence did not support the instructions. We review for an abuse of discretion, United States v. Castellanos-Garcia, 270 F.3d 773, 775 (9th Cir.2001), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 122 S.Ct. 1939 , 152 L.Ed.2d 843 (2002), and we find none. See United States v. Sotelo, 109 F.3d 1446, 1447-48 (9th Cir.1997) (concluding that the district court did not err by refusing to instruct the jury on the definition of “national” where there was no evidence to support such a finding); United States v. Castellanos-Garcia, 270 F.3d at 777 (concluding that the district court did not err by refusing to instruct on an official restraint theory when there was no evidence to support it).

Perez-Moreno’s second contention is that the district court improperly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.