Alvarado-Cano

Alvarado-Cano v. Ashcroft

Good Law
52 F. App'x 971
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 11, 2002Nos. 02-70527, INS A70-778-028California194 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Adrian Alvarado-Ashcroft, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the BIA’s determination that an applicant has not established eligibility for asylum, and must uphold the BIA’s decision unless the evidence compels a contrary result. Cruz-Navarro v. INS, 232 F.3d 1024, 1028 (9th Cir.2000). We deny the petition.

We conclude that substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Alvarado-Cano’s forced conscription in the civil defense patrol failed to establish that he suffered past persecution or has a well-founded fear of future persecution on account of an enumerated ground. See id. at 1029-30 . Because Alvarado-Cano faded to establish eligibility for asylum, he necessarily did not meet the higher standard for withholding of removal. See id. at 1031 .

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.