Mascoto

United States v. Mascoto

Good Law
53 F. App'x 416
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 2002Nos. 01-10690, 02-10021; D.C. No. CR-00-00379-HGCalifornia235 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

*417 MEMORANDUM **

The United States appeals from the district court’s 87-month sentence imposed on Russell Gordon Mascoto following his guilty plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 28 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo a district court’s legal interpretation of the sentencing guidelines. United States v. Thickstun, 110 F.3d 1394, 1400 (9th Cir.1997). We vacate and remand for re-sentencing.

The government challenges the district court’s decision not to impose the 10-year mandatory minimum sentence required under 21 U.S.C. § 841 (b)(1)(A). In declining to impose the 10-year minimum, the district court relied on the three-judge panel decision in United States v. Buckland, 259 F.3d 1157 (9th Cir.2001), which was subsequently reversed in United States v. Buckland, 289 F.3d 558, 565-66 (9th Cir.2002) (en banc). Because the en banc decision applies retroactively, we vacate Mascoto’s sentence and remand to the district court in conformity with the en banc decision. See United States v. Hosoi, No. 01-10604, slip op. at 5, 2002 WL 31628403 (9th Cir. Nov.22, 2002) (per curiam) (vacating…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.