Baramdyka

United States v. Baramdyka

Good Law
53 F. App'x 461
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 2002No. 01-50523; D.C. No. CR-01-00347-ABC-1California306 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

A court order modifying the conditions of his supervised release prohibited Frankel Ivan Baramdyka (Baramdyka) from using “for any purpose or in any manner, any name other than his true legal name.” Baramdyka moved pro se for an order to “Modify Supervised Release as Imposed on June 13, 2001 by Name Change.” 1 By his motion he requested permission to change his name legally, on the understanding that he would provide his new name to the court and the probation department. The district court denied Baramdyka’s motion, finding that “[t]he defendant has not shown any compelling reason to override the Court’s added condition.” Baramdyka, now represented by counsel, appeals.

Baramdyka seeks not to use a name other than his true legal name, but rather to change his true legal name. Because the conditions of his supervised release did not prevent Baramdyka from changing his true legal name, the motion for a modification of those conditions was superfluous. The district court was thus correct to deny the motion, although it should have done so on the ground that the motion was unnecessary and that Baramdyka is not prohibited from changing his legal name by appropriate order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.