Mary Forsyth v. Humana, Inc.

99 F.3d 1504 1996-2 Trade Cases P 71,608 , RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 9154 , 20 Employee Benefits Cas. 2065 , 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8063 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13 ,379 Mary FORSYTH; Marrietta Cade; Willie Andrews; Mary Lou Buehler; Helen Staves; Randolph Bratten; and Searle Auto Glass, Inc., d/b/a Best Glass Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HUMANA, INC., a Delaware corporation; Humana Health Insurance of Nevada, Inc., a Nevada corporation; and Does I through X, inclusive, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16548. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 4, 1995. Decided Nov. 5, 1996. W.B. Markovits, Markovits & Greiwe, Cincinnati, OH, Will Kemp and J. Randall Jones, Harrison, Kemp & Jones, Las Vegas, NV, for plaintiffs-appellants. David N. Frederick, Las Vegas, NV, and Robert N. Eccles, O'Melveny & Myers, Washington, DC, for defendants-appellees. G. Robert Blakey, Notre Dame Law School, Notre Dame, IN, argued for appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-89-00249-PMP. Before: WALLACE and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, District Judge. *…