Gutierrez-Pantoja

United States v. Gutierrez-Pantoja

Good Law
53 F. App'x 486
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 20, 2002No. 01-10715; D.C. No. CR-01-00016-DWHCalifornia463 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Carlos Gutierrez-Pantoja appeals the sentence imposed after he pled guilty to Unlawful Reentry by a Deported Alien, 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a). The district court sentenced Gutierrez-Pantoja to seventy months of imprisonment. The court applied a sixteen-level enhancement because Gutierrez-Pantoja had been previously deported after a conviction in California state court for a “drug trafficking offense for which the sentence imposed exceeded 13 months.” U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A). Gutierrez-Pantoja argues that his prior conviction under California Health and Safety Code § 11351.5 is not a “drug trafficking offense” under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A), and that the district court therefore erred by applying the sixteen-level enhancement.

We apply a two-step analysis when considering whether a prior conviction triggers a federal sentencing enhancement. First, we inquire whether the statutory definition of the prior conviction falls within the conduct described in the sentencing enhancement. United States v. Corona-Sanchez, 291 F.3d 1201, 1203 (9th Cir. 2002) (en banc). If so, the enhancement is triggered. Second, if the statute of prior conviction prohibits conduct both within and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.