Corcoran

Corcoran v. Commissioner

Good Law
54 F. App'x 254
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 12, 2002No. 02-71577; T.C. No. 2947-01California261 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

The Corcorans appeal the Tax Court’s determination of an income tax deficiency and the imposition of penalties and sanctions. They argue that income earned by United States citizens within the United States is not “gross income” subject to federal taxation. Specifically, they contend that wages, unemployment compensation, and interest that they received are not sources of taxable income. Such an argument has no basis in the tax code and is legally frivolous. Gross income is defined “very broadly as ‘all income from whatever source derived.’ ” See Coady v. Commissioner, 213 F.3d 1187, 1190 (9th Cir.2000) (quoting 26 U.S.C. § 61 (a)).

There is also no merit to taxpayers’ contentions that they were denied their administrative due process rights or that their notice of deficiency is invalid. See Wilcox v. Commissioner, 848 F.2d 1007, 1008 (9th Cir.1988) (“[Fjailing to provide a taxpayer with an administrative fact finding hearing does not violate due process.”); Kantor v. Commissioner, 998 F.2d 1514, 1521 (9th Cir.1993) (“[W]e will not look behind a deficiency notice to question the ... procedures leading to a determination.”) (internal quotation omitted).

Finally, we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.