Castro-Diaz

Castro-Diaz v. Ashcroft

Good Law
54 F. App'x 288
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 15, 2003No. 02-70272; INS No. A70-949-884California270 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

*289 MEMORANDUM **

Israel Alberto Castro-Diaz, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence, Li v. Ashcroft, 312 F.3d 1094, 1099 (9th Cir.2002), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s conclusion that Castro-Diaz failed to prove that he was persecuted on account of an enumerated ground. See INS v. EliasZacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 482-83 , 112 S.Ct. 812 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992) (political opinion); Cruz-Navarro v. INS, 232 F.3d 1024, 1029-30 (9th Cir.2000) (membership in a particular social group). Castro-Diaz testified that guerillas demanded money, information and materials from him, and in one incident killed his cattle and attempted to burn his ranch. Castro-Diaz failed to demonstrate that this treatment was on account of an actual or imputed political opinion. See Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 482-83 , 112 S.Ct. 812 .

Castro-Diaz also failed to establish a well-founded fear…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.