Butron-Ponce

MEMORANDUM **

Alfredo Butron-Ponce appeals the eight-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for importing marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Butron-Ponce contends that the district court’s instructions to the grand jury violated his Fifth Amendment right to a grand jury’s independent exercise of discretion because the instructions failed to inform the jury that, beyond whether there is probable cause, it should decide whether a prosecution should go forward. This argument is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Marcucci, 299 F.3d 1156,1164 (9th Cir.2002).

Butron-Ponce’s contention that the district court should have dismissed the indictment because it failed to allege mens rea as to drug type and quantity of controlled substance is foreclosed by United States v. Carranza, 289 F.3d 634, 644 (9th Cir.2002) (Apprendi did not change the long-established rule that the government does not have to prove that the defendant knew the drug type and amount of controlled substance).

Butron-Ponce’s contention that sections 952 and 960 are facially unconstitutional in light of…