Sonko

Sonko v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Good Law
56 F. App'x 388
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 19, 2003No. 02-70226; INS No. A75-251-602California306 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Alagie Sonko, a native and citizen of Gambia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of deportation. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). Kalaw v. INS, 133 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir.1997). We review for substantial evidence factual determinations concerning a petitioner’s eligibility for asylum, and must uphold them unless the evidence compels a contrary result. INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478 , 481 & n. 1, 112 S.Ct. 812 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We deny the petition.

We conclude that the BIA’s determination that Sonko did not demonstrate a well-founded fear of future persecution on account of any enumerated ground is supported by substantial evidence. See Pra-sad v. INS, 47 F.3d 336, 338 (9th Cir.1995). Sonko testified that in Gambia he was a member of Fulan Kafo, a charitable organization. After he left Gambia, several members of the Fulan Kafo were arrested for their participation in a mass strike. We agree that this is insufficient evidence to demonstrate a well-founded fear of future persecution. See id.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.