Langit

Langit v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Good Law
56 F. App'x 823
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 28, 2003No. 01-71904; INS Nos. A35-532-876, A37-486-648California283 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Abraham and Melecia Langit (“Lan-gits”) have a Fifth Amendment right to due process in a deportation hearing, including the right to a full and fair hearing. Burgos-Abril v. I.N.S., 58 F.3d 475, 476 (9th Cir.1995). In general, an alien has been denied a full and fair hearing only if the thing complained of causes the alien to suffer some prejudice. Id. The immigration judge (“IJ”) did not violate the Lan-gits’ due process rights when he accepted an oral offer of proof submitted by their attorney instead of taking live testimony from the Langits’ children.

The record contains no evidence indicating that the IJ refused to allow the Lan-gits’ children to testify. Although the IJ conducted an off-the-record discussion to determine whether an offer of proof would be acceptable, he later summarized the content of that discussion on the record. He then gave the Langits’ attorney the opportunity to specify the details of their off-the-record conversation and make known any disagreements or objections to the use of the offer of proof instead of live testimony. The record contains no indication that the Langits’ attorney objected to the procedure nor that the IJ would have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.