Marroquin

MEMORANDUM **

Ges E. Marroquin appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment uphold *731 ing the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s April 22, 1997 decision denying disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income and declining to re-open a January 11, 1995 decision denying supplemental security income benefits. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g). We review de novo the district court’s decision, and we review for substantial evidence and legal error the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) decision. Tackett v. Ap-fel, 180 F.3d 1094,1097 (9th Cir.1999). We affirm.

Because Marroquin failed to meet the regulatory requirements for re-opening, the ALJ properly denied Marroquin’s request to re-open the disability claim decided on January 11, 1995. See 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.1488 , 416.1489; see also Mines v. Sullivan, 981 F.2d 1068, 1070 (9th Cir. 1992) (stating standard).

Regarding Marroquin’s appeal from the 1997 decision, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s finding that Marroquin was not disabled. See Tackett, 180 F.3d at 1098 . The ALJ provided specific, cogent reasons for disbelieving…