Leon-Ibarra

United States v. Leon-Ibarra

Good Law
58 F. App'x 338
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 12, 2003No. 02-50216; D.C. No. CR-01-03207-BTMCalifornia211 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Gertrudis Leon-Ibarra appeals her conviction, following a guilty plea, for importation of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960.

Leon-Ibarra’s contention that 21 U.S.C. § 960 is facially unconstitutional following Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and that United States v. Harris, 536 U.S. 545 , 122 S.Ct. 2406 , 153 L.Ed.2d 524 (2002), overrules United States v. Buckland, 289 F.3d 558, 562 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1105 , 122 S.Ct. 2314 , 152 L.Ed.2d 1067 (2002), and United States v. Mendozar-Paz, 286 F.3d 1104 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 123 S.Ct. 573 , 154 L.Ed.2d 459 (2002), is foreclosed by United States v. Hernandez, 322 F.3d 592 (9th Cir.2003). Leon-Ibarra’s contention that the indictment was defective because it did not allege that Leon-Ibarra had the mens rea as to the drug type and quantity is foreclosed by United States v. Carranza, 289 F.3d 634 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 123 S.Ct. 572 , 154 L.Ed.2d 458 (2002). Leon-Ibarra’s conviction is

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.