22:I[98912,["/_next/static/chunks/0asocxi83kb~5.js","/_next/static/chunks/0n4z.7yu76je-.js","/_next/static/chunks/0eyt_ou8dj52g.js","/_next/static/chunks/01bcia3bjqt9z.js","/_next/static/chunks/15egrlmmf_yst.js"],"CaseDetailGate"] 23:T4c0,MEMORANDUM ** Eddie Joe Annett appeals his 144-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction to two counts of conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 and two counts of possession of a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 844 . Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Annett’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no arguable issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Annett has filed a pro se supplemental brief. Our examination of the briefs and independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no issues warranting review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 1 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. . We decline to review Annett’s ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claims on direct appeal. See United States v. Hanoum, 33 F.3d 1128, 1131-32 (9th Cir.1994). Annett’s request for a new attorney is denied.24:T4db,

MEMORANDUM **

Eddie Joe Annett appeals his 144-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction to two counts of conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 and two counts of possession of a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 844 . Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Annett’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no arguable issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Annett has filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our examination of the briefs and independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no issues warranting review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 1

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

. We decline to review Annett’s ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claims on direct appeal. See United States v. Hanoum, 33 F.3d 1128, 1131-32 (9th Cir.1994). Annett’s request for a new attorney is denied.