Castro-Talavera

Castro-Talavera v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Good Law
59 F. App'x 214
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 2003No. 01-71956; INS Nos. A73-442-801, A73442-802, A73-442-803California643 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Raymundo Castro-Talavera, Maria Teresa Castro-Zapata, and Jonathan Castro-Zapata (“the Petitioners”), natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) discretionary determination finding them ineligible for suspension of deportation pursuant to former section 244(a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (a)(1) (1994) (repealed). The Petitioners also seek review on the ground that the IJ conducted the hearing in a manner that violated their right to due process. Finally, the Petitioners request attorneys’ fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (b). For the reasons set forth, we deny the petition.

Jurisdiction in this case falls under the transitional rules of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009-546 (1996) (“IIRIRA”), because (1) immigration proceedings were initiated before IIRIRA’s effective date of April 1, 1997 and (2) the BIA’s final order of deportation was issued after October 30, 1996. See Kalaw v. INS, 133 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir.1997).

Under IIRIRA’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.