McDowell

United States v. McDowell

Good Law
59 F. App'x 987
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 21, 2003No. 02-30231; D.C. No. CR-01-00124-SEHCalifornia272 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Rueben Nathaniel McDowell appeals the sentence imposed after his guilty-plea conviction to conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 . We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

At sentencing, McDowell requested a downward departure because he had been incarcerated for a related state drug felony conviction and because of his extraordinary post-offense rehabilitation. Although the district court did not depart on these grounds, it did expressly take them into account in sentencing McDowell to the low-end of the guideline range.

McDowell contends on appeal that his sentence should be vacated because the district court did not explicitly decline to depart from the Sentencing Guidelines on these two grounds. He argues that the district court’s silence on this issue should be treated the same as if it concluded that it lacked the power to depart. This argument is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Garda-Garda, 927 F.2d 489, 491 (9th Cir.1991) (holding that “[ujnder these circumstances we will assume that the district court knows and applies the law correctly, realizes that it does have authority to depart, but concludes that it…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.