Hayes

United States v. Hayes

Good Law
59 F. App'x 993
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 21, 2003No. 02-50387; D.C. No. CR-01-00096-VAP-1California298 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jerron Adides Hayes appeals the 57-month sentence imposed after his guilty-plea conviction for bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a). Hayes argues that the district court erred by applying a two-level enhancement under United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”) § 2B3.1(b)(2)(F) for making “a threat of death” during the robbery. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742 , and we affirm.

*994 We review for clear error the factual findings made by the district court at sentencing. United States v. Lavender, 224 F.3d 939, 941-42 (9th Cir.2000). Hayes does not dispute that the note he handed to the bank teller contained a threat of death. Nor could he. The note stated that “I have a gun! I will kill starting with you!” Hayes argues instead that he was not aware of the contents of the note because one of his accomplices wrote it. We conclude that the district court did not clearly err by finding Hayes knew that the note contained a “threat of death.” The extensive planning and Hayes’s own statement to the teller that he had a gun, in conjunction with his testimony at the evidentiary hearing that was not credible, raises a legitimate inference…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.