Pimentel-Tafolla

United States v. Pimentel-Tafolla

Good Law
60 F. App'x 656
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 6, 2003Nos. 99-30330, 99-30335, 99-30336, 99-30337, 99-30357, 99-30358, 99-30369; D.C. No. CR-97-00037-JDSCalifornia5,962 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

ORDER

This Court’s memorandum disposition, filed October 17, 2002, is hereby withdrawn and replaced with the attached disposition.

With the filing of this new disposition, Appellant Springfield’s petition for rehearing, filed October 31, 2002, is DENIED.

*660 MEMORANDUM *

The seven defendants in these consolidated cases (Mariano Pimentel-Tafolla, Randy James, Donald Frank Printz, Vincent Martinez, Carlos Salazar-Lopez, William Lanter, and Joshua Springfield) were involved, to varying degrees, in a methamphetamine trafficking conspiracy in Billings, Montana. All were convicted of conspiracy to possess methamphetamine with intent to distribute, under 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), 846, and 18 U.S.C. § 2 . Each defendant was also convicted of some combination of various counts of possessing with intent to distribute methamphetamine, under 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 , and using a firearm in a drug trafficking crime, under 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 . The facts of the case and the specific convictions are well known to all parties, so we will not repeat them here except as necessary to explain our holding.

We address Appellants’ contentions on appeal in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.