Villareal-Rodriguez

United States v. Villareal-Rodriguez

Good Law
61 F. App'x 322
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 14, 2003No. 00-50310; D.C. No. CR-99-01515-KCalifornia731 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

ORDER AND AMENDED

*324 MEMORANDUM **

ORDER

The memorandum disposition filed on August 15, 2002, is amended as follows:

With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny appellant’s petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are denied.

There shall be no further filings in this closed appeal.

MEMORANDUM

Martiniano Villareal-Rodriguez appeals the 120-month sentence imposed following a jury trial in which he was convicted of one count of conspiracy to import marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960; one count of conspiracy to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1); three counts of importation of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 , 960 and 18 U.S.C. § 2 ; and three counts of possession with intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Villareal-Rodriguez’s contention…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.