Maneses-Flores

United States v. Maneses-Flores

Good Law
61 F. App'x 458
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 16, 2003No. 02-50409; D.C. No. CR-01-00827-MMMCalifornia156 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Antonio Maneses-Flores appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 57-month sentence imposed for illegally reentering the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . ManesesFlores’s attorney has filed a brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Maneses-Flores has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our review of the Anders brief and our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no issues requiring further review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 1

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

. All pending motions are denied.