Osiname
United States v. Osiname
Opinion
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Babatunde Osiname appeals the district court’s restitution order arising out of his conviction for mail and wire fraud. 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 , 1343. Jeanette L. Franklin appeals her mail and wire fraud convictions. Id. We dismiss in part and affirm in part.
(1) Osiname asserts that the restitution award against him was too high. However, when he pled guilty he waived his right to appeal “any order of restitution.” Appeal waivers are generally enforceable. See United States v. Baramdyka, 95 F.3d 840, 843-44 (9th Cir.1996); United States v. Michlin, 34 F.3d 896, 898 (9th Cir.1994). Osiname presents no legal reason for deviation from the general rule. Thus, we dismiss his appeal.
(2) Osiname’s counsel, Darlene M. Rick-er, has filed a brief and a motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. State of California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 , 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Osiname has filed a supplemental brief. Our review of the briefs and of the record discloses no further issues requiring review. Thus, counsel’s motion to withdraw will be granted.
(3) Franklin first asserts that the evidence was insufficient to sustain her convictions for mail and wire fraud. Of…