Fernandez-Castillo
United States v. Fernandez-Castillo
Opinion
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM *
Appellant Rigoberto Femandez-Castillo (“Fernandez”) challenges his conviction of possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). Fernandez asserts his rights under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161 , were violated and contends the district court erred in allowing testimony at trial of his prior bad acts. We affirm.
I
The Speedy Trial Act requires the trial of a defendant to “commence within seventy days from the filing date (and making public) of the information or indictment, or from the date the defendant has appeared before a judicial officer of the court.” 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (c)(1). If required by the ends of justice, the court may grant a continuance and declare certain days excludable from the seventy-day Speedy Trial clock. Id. § 3161(h)(8)(A). In determining whether the ends of justice warrant delaying a trial, one factor the court must consider is whether the failure to grant a continuance would deny defense counsel “the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation.” Id. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv).
*780 On February 14, 2001, Fernandez moved for a continuance. The district court granted the continuance the…