Hernandez

Hernandez v. Ashcroft

Good Law
62 F. App'x 808
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 17, 2003No. 02-71482; INS No. A93-242-016California215 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Francisco Humberto Hernandez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the immigration judge’s denial of his motion to terminate removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . See Ocampo-Duran v. Ashcroft, 254 F.3d 1133, 1134 (9th Cir.2001) (noting that “[w]e retain jurisdiction to determine our own jurisdiction”). We review de novo, Ramirez-Castro v. INS, 287 F.3d 1172, 1174 (9th Cir.2002), and we dismiss the petition.

Hernandez contends that he is not removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (a)(2)(A)(iii) as an alien convicted of an aggravated felony at any time after “admission,” because he entered the United States without inspection, and then adjusted to lawful permanent resident status under the Special Agricultural Worker program. We disagree. Because Hernandez was “lawfully admitted” as a legal permanent resident through adjustment of status before he was convicted of an aggravated felony, the BIA correctly denied Hernandez’s request to terminate removal proceedings. See Ocampo-Duran, 254 F.3d at 1134-35 . We dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction. See id. at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.