Thomas

Thomas v. Van Boening

Good Law
63 F. App'x 364
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 15, 2003No. 02-35804; D.C. No. CV-02-05032-WFNCalifornia323 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Gregory O. Thomas, an inmate at the Washington State Penitentiary (“WSP”), appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison officials violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments by refusing to deliver to him magazines deemed to be “sexually explicit” under WSP policy 450.100. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review dismissals under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) de novo, Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000), and dismissals under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B)© for abuse of discretion, Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 33 , 112 S.Ct. 1728 , 118 L.Ed.2d 340 (1992). We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.

Thomas alleged that the prison officials violated his equal protection rights by permitting the WSP library to stock allegedly sexually explicit books, but refusing to deliver similarly sexually explicit magazines to him. The district court properly dismissed this claim. See Lee v. City of Los Angeles, 250 F.3d 668, 686-87 (9th Cir.2001).

However, the district court improperly dismissed Thomas’ First Amendment challenge to WSP policy 450.100 because, in the absence of published…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.