Dalton

Businessmen's Assurance v. Dalton

Good Law
63 F. App'x 992
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 22, 2003No. 02-15996California677 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Appellant Norma Jean Dalton appeals the district court’s judgment in favor of Linda Townsend and its award of attorney’s fees. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Appellant claims that under Arizona law, Businessmen’s Assurance (“BMA”) waived compliance with its change of beneficiary procedures by filing this interpleader action, and that the court therefore must look to the intent of the insured to determine the beneficiary of Bobby Townsend’s life insurance policy. However, the Arizona Supreme Court has held that an insurer does not waive compliance with its change of beneficiary procedures by filing an interpleader action if the insurer demands compliance with those procedures during the insured’s lifetime. McLennan v. McLennan, 29 Ariz. 191 , 240 P. 339, 340-41 (Ariz.1925). BMA twice informed Bobby Townsend that it would require compliance with its procedures before changing his beneficiary. It therefore did not waive compliance with those procedures when it later interpled the proceeds of his policy in an attempt to protect itself from double payment.

Even if we were to find that BMA had waived compliance with its change of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.