Aki

United States v. Aki

Good Law
64 F. App'x 96
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 14, 2003No. 02-10158; D.C. No. CR-99-00510-HGCalifornia417 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Derek Kaleolani AM appeals his conviction and sentence following a conditional guilty plea. We affirm.

AM was arrested when the Honolulu police, while responding to a 911 call, saw what appeared to be controlled substances, in plain view, through the open passenger door of a car that AM left running on the shoulder of Highway 1. This led to an arrest, a search warrant, and the discovery of the remainder of the evidence that resulted in this prosecution.

AM executed a written plea agreement, by the terms of which he reserved the right to appeal the denial of his motion to dismiss and his right to appeal on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel.

Although a court has limited power to dismiss an information, dismissal is a disfavored remedy. United States v. Rogers, 751 F.2d 1074, 1076 (9th Cir.1985). The trial court did not err when it rejected AM’s motion to dismiss because the motion was based on alleged misconduct by the police that was only remotely incidental to AM’s arrest and prosecution. Accordingly, none of the grounds for exercise of supervisory powers is present in this case.

With respect to AM’s Sixth Amendment claim, this court generally will…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.