Department of Environmental Quality Oregon v. Spar Investment Co.

Good Law
64 F. App'x 648
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 2003No. 01-35939California1,223 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

The Department of Environmental Quality for the State of Oregon (“DEQ”) appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to various owners and operators of a dry cleaning business located in MilwauMe, Oregon. Because the relevant facts are known to the parties they are not repeated here.

Departing from a baseline of strict liability, see Or.Rev.Stat. § 465.255, the Oregon legislature in 1995 implemented a separate and distinct liability scheme for the dry cleaning industry:

Or.Rev.Stat. § 465.503(1).

This broad grant of immunity, however, is inapplicable if “[t]he release resulted from a violation of federal or state laws in effect at the time of the release, including but not limited to waste minimization requirements imposed under ORS 465.505.” Or.Rev.Stat. § 465.503(3)(b). Notwithstanding this statutory language and the owners’ and operators’ long history of improperly disposing perchloroethylene (“PCE”) directly into the ground, the district court determined that § 465.503(3)(b) was ambiguous, and resorted to legislative history in concluding that “only dry cleaning owners and operators who do not comply with environmental laws after June 30, 1995…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.