Peppa

United States v. Peppa

Good Law
13 F. Supp. 669·1936 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1514
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 1936NO. 12614-YCalifornia1,907 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Yankwich, J.

Clause (1) (A), subdivision (a) of section 1693, title 26 U.S.C.A. denounces as a crime the act of “Every person who simulates or falsely or fraudulently executes or signs any bond, permit, entry, or other document required by the provisions of the internal revenue laws, or by any regulation made in pursuance thereof.” (Italics added.)

The defendant is accused by the grand jury of the crime of simulation and execution of an Internal Revenue Order Form for narcotics. The charging part of the indictment reads: “On or about the 10th day of August, 1934, in the County of Riverside, state, division and district aforesaid, and within the jurisdiction of the United States and of this Honorable Court, (the defendant) did knowingly, wilfully, unlawfully, and feloniously, falsely and fraudulently simulate and execute a certain document required by the provisions of the Internal Revenue Laws of the United States, to-wit: a United States Internal Revenue Order Form for narcotics, by then and there knowingly, wilfully, unlawfully, feloniously, falsely and fraudulently raising the amount of morphine sulphate tablets ordered and authorized by said permit from two hundred half grain tablets to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.