Tischauser

Bristol-Myers Co. v. Tischauser

Good Law
18 F. Supp. 228·1936 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1633
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 1936No. 809-SCalifornia612 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Stephens, J.

Complainant asks that a temporary injunction issue under the provisions of the so-called California Fair Trade Act (Statutes of California 1931, c. 278, p. 583,' as amended 1933, c. 260, p. 793).

In brief and very generally the statute in question strikes at the below cost “leader” sale by prohibiting the retailing of factory marked goods in competition, through regular course of business at less than factory fixed prices, either by one contracting to maintain the price or by one who has secured the goods from other than factory sources.

Respondent E. A. Tischauser objects to the issuance of the writ upon several grounds, which raise, among others, the same constitutional questions relating to the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U. S. Constitution that have been passed upon — but not in agreement — by several eminent Judges of the California Superior Court in exhaustive written opinions. I shall not add another opinion for the reason that it would settle nothing and could afford but doubtful aid to an appellate tribunal.

I willingly yield, however, to my own temptation to reassert and reaffirm the wholesome doctrine that legislative acts are presumed to be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.