Buckley

Buckley v. Gomez

Good Law
36 F. Supp. 2d 1216·1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23433
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 1997No. Civ. 95-2372-BTM(JFS)California6,407 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Stiven, J.

*1219 MEMORANDUM DECISION GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS [35-1]; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [51-1], [56-1].

A hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss was held on July 31, 1997, and a hearing on Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment was held August 14, 1997, before the Honorable James F. Stiven, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Antonio Cortez Buckley, pro se, appeared telephoni-cally, and Mr. Robert F. Helfand, Deputy Attorney General of the State of California, appeared in court representing the Defendants.

I. Procedural History

On September 28, 1995, Plaintiff filed a federal civil rights complaint against seven Defendants: James H. Gomez, Director of the California Department of Corrections (“CDC”); K.W. Prunty, Calipatria Warden; J. Variz, 1 Calipatria Correctional Officer (“C/ O”); J.J. Scott, Calipatria C/0; L. Ricks, Calipatria C/0; Bender, Calipatria C/0; and R. Goodard, Calipatria C/0. On December 5, 1995, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint against the same previously-named Defendants.

Defendants Gomez, Prunty, and Goodard have renewed their motions to dismiss based on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.