Owens

Owens v. Ventura County Superior Court

Good Law
42 F. Supp. 2d 993·1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11864
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 1999No. CV 98-3964 AHM(RC)California3,163 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Matz, J.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636 , the Court has reviewed the Petition and other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman, as well as petitioner’s objections, and has made a de novo determination.

IT IS ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted; (2) the Report and Recommendation is adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law herein; and (3) Judgment shall be entered denying the petition for writ of habeas corpus and dismissing the action with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and Judgment by the United States mail on the parties.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This Report and Recommendation is submitted to the Honorable A. Howard Matz, United States District Court Judge, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and General Order 194 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

BACKGROUND

I

On February 14, 1997, in the Ventura…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.