Bertelsen

Bertelsen v. Hartford Life Insurance

Good Law
1 F. Supp. 3d 1060·2014 WL 585417·2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19225
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 2014No. 2:12-cv-01440-TLN-GCHCalifornia6,724 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nunley, J.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

This action arises out of Defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company’s (“Defendant”) termination of Plaintiff Karen Bertelsen’s (“Plaintiff’) long-term disability benefits. This motion is before the Court on Plaintiffs motion for judgment pursuant to Rule 52 1 (ECF *1063 No. 17) and Defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company’s motion for judgment pursuant to Rule 52 or alternatively for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 (ECF No. 20). Each party opposes the other’s motion. (ECF Nos. 24, 25.) The Court has carefully considered the parties’ arguments, and hereby grants Plaintiffs motion for judgment pursuant to Rule 52.

I.FINDINGS OF FACT

A. Plaintiff Files a Claim for Long-Term Disability Benefits

1. Plaintiff Karen Bertelsen was born on July 4,1964.

2. Plaintiff was employed by Soma Networks, Inc. (“Soma”) as an engineering document control manager. She worked for Soma from 2006 to 2008.

3. Her job duties as a document control manager were sedentary. Her job duties generally required her to communicate engineering plan changes to appropriate parties, create policies and procedures, and troubleshoot. To carry…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.