Cortez

Cortez v. City of Porterville

Good Law
5 F. Supp. 3d 1160·2014 WL 1101228·2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37604
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 2014No. 1:14-cv-00061-LJO-GSACalifornia2,844 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Lawrenceneill, J.

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 4)

I.PRELIMINARY STATEMENT TO PARTIES AND COUNSEL

Judges in the Eastern District of California carry the heaviest caseloads in the nation, and this Court is unable to devote inordinate time and resources to individual cases and matters. Given the shortage of district judges and staff, this Court addresses only the arguments, evidence, and matters necessary to reach the decision in this order. The parties and counsel are encouraged to contact the offices of United States Senators Diane Feinstein and Barbara Boxer to address this Court’s inability to accommodate the parties and this action. The parties are required to reconsider consent to conduct all further proceedings before a Magistrate Judge, whose schedules are far more realistic and accommodating to parties than that of U.S. District Judge Lawrence J. O’Neill, who must prioritize criminal and older civil cases.

Civil trials set before Judge O’Neill trail until he becomes available and are subject to suspension mid-trial to accommodate criminal matters. Civil trials are no longer reset to a later date if Judge O’Neill is unavailable on the original date set for trial. Moreover, this Court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.