In re Iphone Application Litigation
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Koh, J.
*1007 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and a putative class, bring this action against Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) for alleged violations of California’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”), Cal. Civ.Code §§ 1750, et seq., and California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), Cal. Bus. & Prof.Code §§ 17200, et seq. Before the Court is Apple’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (“Mot.”) ECF No. 231. Plaintiffs oppose the Motion, (“Opp’n”) ECF No. 266, and Apple replies, (“Reply”) ECF No. 273. The Court held a hearing on the Motion on October 31, 2013. ECF No. 288; see also (“Oct. 31 Hr’g Tr.”) ECF No. 291. Having considered the parties’ submissions and oral arguments, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS Apple’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background
1. The Parties
Plaintiffs filed their Third Amended Consolidated Complaint (“TAC”) on behalf of four named Plaintiffs who assert two separate types of claims and seek to represent two separate classes of individuals. ECF No. 104.
Plaintiffs Anthony Chiu (“Chiu”) and Cameron Dwyer (“Dwyer”), both California residents assert “iDeviee…