Commonwealth Enterprises v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.

101 F.3d 705 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. COMMONWEALTH ENTERPRISES, a California Partnership; Panorama Enterprises, a California Partnership; Arthur Blech, Defendants-counter-claimants-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Massachusetts corporation, Plaintiff-cross-defendant-Appellee. No. 95-55719. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 6, 1996. * Decided Nov. 13, 1996. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** INTRODUCTION 2 Commonwealth Enterprises, Panorama Enterprises, and Arthur Blech (collectively, "Commonwealth), defendants-counter-claimants-appellants, appeal from a judgment entered after a bench trial in favor of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company ("Liberty Mutual"), plaintiff-cross-defendant-appellee. They also appeal from the dismissal of their amended cross-complaint. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and affirm. FACTS 3 Liberty Mutual provided property and…