Interpool Limited v. Char Yigh Marine (Panama) S.A. Char Ching Marine (h.k.) Co., Ltd.

101 F.3d 705 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. INTERPOOL LIMITED, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHAR YIGH MARINE (PANAMA) S.A.; Char Ching Marine (H.K.) Co., Ltd., Defendants-Appellants. No. 95-56359. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 7, 1996. Decided Nov. 14, 1996. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Jan. 10, 1997. Before: O'SCANNLAIN, T.G. NELSON and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 ORDER * 2 This matter comes to us for the third time, returning from the order of remand in Interpool Ltd. v. Char Yigh Marine (Panama) S.A. (Interpool II), Nos. 92-55339, 92-55427 (9th Cir. Mar. 8, 1995) (unpublished memorandum disposition). In that disposition, we held that Char Yigh did not have legal capacity to sue as a third-party claimant to the C.C. San Francisco, and that "Char Yigh's failure in its earlier submissions to predicate an argument, or to file a motion based on Fed.R.Civ.P. 25(c) constitutes a waiver of any such…