Ralph Coleman v. Pete Wilson

Good Law
101 F.3d 705·1996 WL 665551·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39613
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 14, 199695-17039California684 words

Opinion

Opinion

101 F.3d 705 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ralph COLEMAN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Pete WILSON, et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 95-17039. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 7, 1996. Decided Nov. 14, 1996. 1 Before: FLETCHER AND FERGUSON, Circuit Judges and KING, * District Judge 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 California Governor Pete Wilson and various California prison officials appeal a district court ruling related to a preliminary injunction requiring them to implement a plan to protect a class of state prisoners who suffer from serious mental disorders and take psychotropic medications from exposure to extreme heat. The district court did not issue a final order in this matter and as a result this appeal is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. I. 4 The district court, in its review of a systemic challenge to the provision of mental health care services to prisoners in institutions within the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.