Borders v. Smucker

Good Law
101 F.3d 705·1996 WL 660938·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39617
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 13, 199696-35127California548 words

Opinion

Opinion

101 F.3d 705 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Frank R. BORDERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joy K. SMUCKER, individually and in her official capacity as Public Defender for King County; Maureen M. Saylor, individually and in her official capacity as MA director of Western State Sex Offender Program; Lael Zealstroum, individually and in her official capacity as Forensic Therapist; Jacke Linda, individually and in her official capacity as Deputy Prosecuting Attorney for King County; M.M. Vitals, individually and in his official capacity as Clinical Director of Western State Sex Offender Program; Mark Allen, individually and in his official capacity as Forensic Therapist, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-35127. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 5, 1996. * Decided Nov. 13, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Washington state prisoner Frank Borders appeals pro se the district court's dismissal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.