Estes

Estes v. Judiciary of State of Nevada

Good Law
101 F.3d 705
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 29, 1995705California586 words

Opinion

Opinion

101 F.3d 705 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael W. ESTES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The JUDICIARY OF STATE OF NEVADA; Cheryl Lau; Frankie Sue Del Papa; Rodney Burr; Lee A. Gates; Robert B. Gaston; Henderson Police Dept.; H.P.D. Detective 1, a white male; H.P.D. Detective 2, a black male; H.P.D. Detective 3, a white male; H.P.D. Detective 4, a white female; Henderson Jail; Clark County District Attorney's Office Deputy D.A. 1, a white female; Clark County Board of Commissioners; John Moran; Clark County Detention Center; Director of C.C.D.C.; Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Dept.; Clark County Public Defenders Office; Curtis L. Brown, atty; D. Bruce Anderson, atty; Nevada Department of Prisons; Southern Desert Correctional Center; Leon Hardison; S.D.C.C. Classification Committee; Northern Nevada Correctional Center; Brenda Burns, N.N.C.C. Classification Committee; Nevada State Prison; John Ignacio; Robert G. Farrar; c/o White; c/o Adams; N.S.P.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.