Jackson v. O'Rear

Good Law
101 F.3d 705·1996 WL 660915·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39612
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 13, 199696-15036California351 words

Opinion

Opinion

101 F.3d 705 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mitchell Harrell JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jerry A. O'REAR, Sergeant; LT. Branch; CSO Buffton; CPO Fischer; CSO Neponen; SGT. Severson; CSO Young; CSO Meyer; Tom House, Deputy Warden, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-15036. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 5, 1996. * Decided Nov. 13, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM ** Mitchell Harrell Jackson, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging retaliation in violation of the First Amendment and denial of due process in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment, McGuckin v. Smith, 974 F.2d 1050, 1059 (9th Cir.1992), and we vacate and remand. Before entering summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.