Monroe v. U.S. Marshals

101 F.3d 706 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Sue MONROE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. MARSHALS; U.S. Department of Justice; George Burke, individually and jointly in his official capacity, Defendants, and Judy Smith, Registered Nurse in her Official Capacity; City of Kent; United States of America; Nancy Lederwood Van Vleek, Physician's Assistant; Dennis Bylerly, individually and jointly in his official capacity; King County Health Department, dba King county Jail Health, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-35716. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 6, 1996. * Decided Nov. 15, 1996. Before: WRIGHT, BRUNETTI, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Sue Monroe, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se both the district court's dismissal of the City of Kent and several individual defendants, and its summary judgment in favor of the United States, in her action under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671-2680 ("FTCA").…