United States v. Refugia Marquez, A/K/A Cookie Marquez

101 F.3d 706 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Refugia MARQUEZ, a/k/a Cookie Marquez Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-10274. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 16, 1996. * Decided Nov. 14, 1996. 1 Before: WIGGINS and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and VANCE, District Judge ** . 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Refugia Marquez appeals her conviction for conspiring to file false statements with the Immigration and Naturalization Service ("INS"; aiding and abetting the filing of false statements with the INS; and making false acknowledgments to the INS. Marquez contends that the district court abused its discretion by admitting "other crimes" evidence in violation of Fed.R.Evid. 404(b). We affirm. 4 Marquez argues that the district court erred by allowing Manuel Felix, Albert Perales, Samuel Maxim, Cesar Condes, and Saul Sandoval to testify about "other crimes" in violation of Fed.R.Evid. 404(b). Marquez complains…