United States v. Raul Valenzuela-Cervantes

101 F.3d 706 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raul VALENZUELA-CERVANTES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-50123. D.C. No. CR-94-00754-MRP-01. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 21, 1996. * Oct. 23, 1996. Before BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Valenzuela-Cervantes appeals his conviction after conditionally pleading guilty to illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . Valenzuela-Cervantes contends the district court erred when, upon remand, it denied his motion for nationwide discovery to support his selective prosecution claim. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review for abuse of discretion, United States v. Marshall, 56 F.3d 1210, 1211 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 1830 (1996), and affirm. 3 Valenzuela-Cervantes contends that nationwide discovery is warranted because he has produced a study which allegedly…