Paul Peter Schrey v. Dr. Perry, Chief Medical Officer Mta Baxter, 3 Watch M.H. Carrillo, Warden

101 F.3d 706 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Paul Peter SCHREY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. PERRY, Chief Medical Officer; MTA Baxter, 3 Watch; M.H. Carrillo, Warden, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-16499. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 5, 1996. * Decided Nov. 13, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Paul Peter Schrey, a California state prisoner at the time of the events described in this action, appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his medical needs. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment, McGuckin v. Smith, 974 F.2d 1050, 1059 (9th Cir.1992), and we affirm. 3 To establish a violation of the Eighth Amendment, a prisoner must show that prison officials were deliberately indifferent to the…