John Earl Tomlinson v. Allen Nailor, Agent, Internal Revenue Service Jose Melendez, Treasury Agent

Good Law
101 F.3d 706·1996 WL 660962·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39636
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 13, 199696-55022California386 words

Opinion

Opinion

101 F.3d 706 78 A.F.T.R.2d 96 -7433 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John Earl TOMLINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Allen NAILOR, Agent, Internal Revenue Service; Jose Melendez, Treasury Agent, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-55022. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 5, 1996. * Decided Nov. 13, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John Tomlinson appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action alleging that the defendants violated his constitutional rights and various criminal statutes by attempting to audit his federal income tax return. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990), and we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's minute order dated November 14, 1995 which was incorporated into the district court's corder…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.